| Home | Contact
Us | NAV & Stock Price | Monthly Portfolio Summary Bancroft Fund Ltd. Proxy Voting Guidelines These proxy voting guidelines have been adopted by the Boards of Trustees of Bancroft Fund Ltd. and Ellsworth Fund Ltd. (collectively, the "Funds"), as well as by the Board of Directors of Davis-Dinsmore Management Company ("Davis-Dinsmore"). The Boards of Trustees of the Funds have delegated to Davis-Dinsmore responsibility for voting proxies received by the Funds in their capacities as shareholders of various companies. The Boards recognize that, due to the nature of the Funds' investments, the Funds do not frequently receive proxies. Davis-Dinsmore exercises its voting responsibility with the overall goal of maximizing the value of the Funds' investments. The portfolio managers at Davis-Dinsmore oversee the voting policies and decisions for the Funds. In evaluating voting issues, the portfolio managers may consider information from many sources, including management of a company presenting a proposal, shareholder groups, research analysts, and independent proxy research services. Set forth below are the proxy voting guidelines: A. Matters Related to the Board of Directors 1. The Funds generally will support the election of nominees recommended by management for election as directors. In determining whether to support a particular nominee, Davis-Dinsmore will consider whether the election of that nominee will cause a company to have less than a majority of independent directors. 2. The Funds generally will support proposals to de-classify boards of directors if fewer than 66 2/3% of the directors are independent, and will generally vote against proposals to classify boards of directors. 3. The Funds generally will withhold a vote in favor of a director who has served on a committee which has approved excessive compensation arrangements or proposed equity-based compensation plans that unduly dilute the ownership interests of stockholders. B. Matters Related to Independent Auditors 1. The Funds generally will vote in favor of independent accountants approved by the company. Prior to such vote, however, Davis-Dinsmore will take into consideration whether non-audit fees make up more than 50 to 75% of the total fees paid by the company to the independent auditors, and the nature of the non-audit services provided. C. Corporate Governance Matters 1. Except as provided in Section E.1, as a general rule, the Funds will vote against proposals recommended by management of a company that are being made primarily to implement anti-takeover measures, and will vote in favor of proposals to eliminate policies that are primarily intended to act as anti-takeover measures. 2. Subject to the other provisions of these guidelines, including without limitation provision C.1. above, the Funds generally will vote in accordance with management's recommendations regarding routine matters, including the following: a. Fixing number of directors; b. Stock splits; and c. Change of state of incorporation for specific corporate purposes. D. Matters Related to Equity-Based Compensation Plans 1. The Fund generally will vote in favor of broad-based stock option plans for executives, employees or directors which would not increase the aggregate number of shares of stock available for grant under all currently active plans to over 10% of the total number of shares outstanding. 2. The Funds generally will vote in favor of employee stock purchase plans and employee stock ownership plans permitting purchase of company stock at 85% or more of fair market value. E. Contested Matters 1. Contested situations will be evaluated on a case by case basis by the portfolio manager or analyst at Davis-Dinsmore principally responsible for the particular portfolio security. F. Miscellaneous Matters 1. The Funds may in their discretion abstain from voting shares that have been recently sold. 2. The Funds generally will abstain from voting on issues relating to social and/or political responsibility. 3. Proposals that are not covered by the above-stated guidelines will be evaluated on a case by case basis by the portfolio manager or analyst at Davis-Dinsmore principally responsible for the particular portfolio security. G. Material Conflicts of Interest 1. Conflicts of interest may arise from time to time between Davis-Dinsmore and the Funds. Examples of conflicts of interests include: a. Davis-Dinsmore may manage a pension plan, administer employee benefit plans, or provide services to a company whose management is soliciting proxies; b. Davis-Dinsmore or its officers or directors may have a business or personal relationship with corporate directors, candidates for directorships, or participants in proxy contests; c. Davis-Dinsmore may hold a position in a security contrary to shareholder interests. 2. If a conflict of interest arises with respect to a proxy voting matter, the portfolio manager will promptly notify the Funds' Audit Committee and counsel for independent trustees and the proxies will be voted in accordance with direction received from the Audit Committee. H. Amendments 1. Any proposed material amendment to these Guidelines shall be submitted for review and approval to: a. the Funds' Board of Trustees, including a majority of the disinterested trustees; and b. the Adviser's Board of Directors. 2. Non-material amendments to these Guidelines may be made by the Chair of the Funds, upon consultation with counsel to the Funds and the Funds' Chief Compliance Officer, and will be reported to the Funds' Board of Trustees at their next scheduled in-person meeting. |